Sustainable Living research project
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
The government’s 2017 housing white paper is critical of the construction industry - just as a major piece of research looking into materials choice in the construction industry supply chain gets underway.
It has brought the issues of innovation, modernisation and productivity to the forefront of construction industry policy and practice.
Against the background of a severe housing shortage, falling numbers of new-build housing units and a skills shortage in the house-building sector, it accuses the industry of being 'slow to modernise and make use of more efficient and faster ways of building'.
The solution it suggests is for more homes to be constructed offsite. Such homes, it claims, are 'high quality, reliable, more productive and can be highly energy efficient'.
[edit] Doing things differently
The tone of the white paper - that the housebuilding industry is reluctant to embrace change - echoes that of the Farmer Review of the UK construction labour model 'Modernise or die'. It also reflects Farmer's assertion of the need for more offsite construction of innovative building products:
"What do we need to do to get the industry to do things differently – to change its practices towards those that result in greater productivity, more innovative construction practices, products and materials, and the sustainability of both the industry and the built environment that results from its endeavours?"
[edit] Searching for the right solution
In partnership with building materials and construction firm Tarmac, the University of Hertfordshire's Centre for Sustainable Communities is currently undertaking research into this question.
Focusing on materials choices in the construction industry supply chain, the research is looking at the day-to-day, 'real-life' context in which decisions are made.
Among other things, this involves in-depth interviews with a sample of key industry stakeholders (including civil engineers, Tier 1 contractors, architects, clients, materials specifiers and end-users).
It also involves a large-scale, quantitative survey of such stakeholders and a focus group to consider the research findings. Readers of this blog are encouraged to participate in the project's interviews, survey and focus group.
[edit] Influencing material choices in the supply chain
Underpinning the framing of the research are a number of assumptions about what is likely to influence materials choices in the construction industry supply chain.
Chiming with many of Farmer's core recommendation principles, these include: finance, custom and practice, knowledge/training, regulatory compliance, communication, and client specification. (This is not an exhaustive list, and people are welcome to suggest other factors that have a bearing on materials choices.)
[edit] Aim of the UH-Tarmac Sustainable Living research project
The aim of the UH-Tarmac sustainable living research project, Supporting innovation and best practice in the materials supply chain: Communicating and learning with suppliers and end-users, is to shed light on the barriers to the greater use of innovative, sustainable building materials, by exploring in-depth both the nature of the barriers themselves and the relative significance of each of them in influencing purchasing decisions.
The 3-year, £150,000 research project aims to explore and understand purchasing decision-making processes and contexts in the construction industry supply chain, and the impact of these on the demand for sustainable building products.
[edit] How can I get involved?
The anticipated project outputs include a detailed report on purchasing decision-making in the construction industry supply chain, and briefing notes for industry stakeholders in respect of how to overcome the multiple prima facie barriers to innovation and modernisation that the research will address.
For more information on how to get involved, contact Dr John McCormack, Centre for Sustainable Communities, University of Hertfordshire. 07811 352114 [email protected]
This article was originally published on 15 May 2017 by ICE. It was written by John McCormack, Research Fellow, University of Hertfordshire’s Centre for Sustainable Communities.
--The Institution of Civil Engineers
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles
Check out some of the best features and news from Designing Buildings as well as key stories from around the web.
Your guide to The Construction Reset at UKCW Birmingham.
Accommodating the Victorian and Edwardian working woman. Book review.
Rethinking passive fire protection in design
PFP demands the same level of design rigour as structure or services.
38% of Gen Zs feel safe when a fire door is wedged open.
Stunning images from around the world
Shortlist for CIOB’s Art of Building photography competition.
Guidance for conversion of traditional pre-1919 stone buildings.
Industrial heritage in the Ruhr
A marked difference to the fate of industrial landscapes in the UK.
Communities will be able to build their own clean energy.
Why diversity and inclusion matters for SMEs
CIOB’s D&I Charter shows how practical changes can support long-term growth.
Cut electricity bills to power growth
Coalition sends joint letter to the Chancellor.
Gasholders: a history in pictures. Book review.
Recognition, influence and growth
SocEnv identifies three strategic pillars in new strategy to 2045.


















